Skip to main content Skip to docs navigation

Jind Patti Bisana Population - Mahamaya Nagar, Uttar Pradesh

Jind Patti Bisana is a large village located in Hathras Tehsil of Mahamaya Nagar district, Uttar Pradesh with total 284 families residing. The Jind Patti Bisana village has population of 2022 of which 1086 are males while 936 are females as per Population Census 2011.

In Jind Patti Bisana village population of children with age 0-6 is 347 which makes up 17.16 % of total population of village. Average Sex Ratio of Jind Patti Bisana village is 862 which is lower than Uttar Pradesh state average of 912. Child Sex Ratio for the Jind Patti Bisana as per census is 1065, higher than Uttar Pradesh average of 902.

Jind Patti Bisana village has lower literacy rate compared to Uttar Pradesh. In 2011, literacy rate of Jind Patti Bisana village was 60.48 % compared to 67.68 % of Uttar Pradesh. In Jind Patti Bisana Male literacy stands at 68.08 % while female literacy rate was 51.25 %.

As per constitution of India and Panchyati Raaj Act, Jind Patti Bisana village is administrated by Sarpanch (Head of Village) who is elected representative of village. Our website, don't have information about schools and hospital in Jind Patti Bisana village.

Jind Patti Bisana Data

Particulars Total Male Female
Total No. of Houses 284 - -
Population 2,022 1,086 936
Child (0-6) 347 168 179
Schedule Caste 657 356 301
Schedule Tribe 0 0 0
Literacy 60.48 % 68.08 % 51.25 %
Total Workers 682 544 138
Main Worker 630 - -
Marginal Worker 52 13 39

Caste Factor

Jind Patti Bisana village of Mahamaya Nagar has substantial population of Schedule Caste. Schedule Caste (SC) constitutes 32.49 % of total population in Jind Patti Bisana village. The village Jind Patti Bisana currently doesn’t have any Schedule Tribe (ST) population.

Work Profile

In Jind Patti Bisana village out of total population, 682 were engaged in work activities. 92.38 % of workers describe their work as Main Work (Employment or Earning more than 6 Months) while 7.62 % were involved in Marginal activity providing livelihood for less than 6 months. Of 682 workers engaged in Main Work, 101 were cultivators (owner or co-owner) while 374 were Agricultural labourer.