Skip to main content Skip to docs navigation

Parsi-Parlo H.Q. Population - Kurung Kumey, Arunachal Pradesh

Parsi-Parlo H.Q. is a medium size village located in Parsi-Parlo Circle of Kurung Kumey district, Arunachal Pradesh with total 39 families residing. The Parsi-Parlo H.Q. village has population of 234 of which 121 are males while 113 are females as per Population Census 2011.

In Parsi-Parlo H.Q. village population of children with age 0-6 is 45 which makes up 19.23 % of total population of village. Average Sex Ratio of Parsi-Parlo H.Q. village is 934 which is lower than Arunachal Pradesh state average of 938. Child Sex Ratio for the Parsi-Parlo H.Q. as per census is 552, lower than Arunachal Pradesh average of 972.

Parsi-Parlo H.Q. village has lower literacy rate compared to Arunachal Pradesh. In 2011, literacy rate of Parsi-Parlo H.Q. village was 51.85 % compared to 65.38 % of Arunachal Pradesh. In Parsi-Parlo H.Q. Male literacy stands at 60.87 % while female literacy rate was 43.30 %.

As per constitution of India and Panchyati Raaj Act, Parsi-Parlo H.Q. village is administrated by Sarpanch (Head of Village) who is elected representative of village. Our website, don't have information about schools and hospital in Parsi-Parlo H.Q. village.

Parsi-Parlo H.Q. Data

Particulars Total Male Female
Total No. of Houses 39 - -
Population 234 121 113
Child (0-6) 45 29 16
Schedule Caste 0 0 0
Schedule Tribe 233 121 112
Literacy 51.85 % 60.87 % 43.30 %
Total Workers 98 48 50
Main Worker 45 - -
Marginal Worker 53 25 28

Caste Factor

In Parsi-Parlo H.Q. village, most of the village population is from Schedule Tribe (ST). Schedule Tribe (ST) constitutes 99.57 % of total population in Parsi-Parlo H.Q. village. There is no population of Schedule Caste (SC) in Parsi-Parlo H.Q. village of Kurung Kumey.

Work Profile

In Parsi-Parlo H.Q. village out of total population, 98 were engaged in work activities. 45.92 % of workers describe their work as Main Work (Employment or Earning more than 6 Months) while 54.08 % were involved in Marginal activity providing livelihood for less than 6 months. Of 98 workers engaged in Main Work, 32 were cultivators (owner or co-owner) while 0 were Agricultural labourer.